Why the Premier League…

The Premier League is experiencing a moment of stagnation.

This sense of stagnation is reminiscent of a decade ago when, despite soaring TV revenues, the quality of play among the top clubs in England was underwhelming. Instead, the most exciting football was being showcased in Germany, Spain, and Italy, where clubs like Bayern Munich, Real Madrid, Barcelona, and Juventus consistently outperformed their English counterparts. Leicester City’s surprising title win in 2016 highlighted this disparity.

The introduction of Jürgen Klopp and Pep Guardiola in the 2016-17 season marked a turning point, with their teams, Liverpool and Manchester City, quickly rising to prominence through innovative, attacking styles of play. This era was defined by a blend of tactical innovation and on-field success, arguably representing the zenith of English football.

Today, however, the solution to the Premier League’s current predicament isn’t as straightforward. While teams are still financially robust, as evidenced in their Champions League performances, the game has become increasingly dominated by set pieces, leading to an unexpected decline in open play scoring.

After 28 weeks, Premier League teams have scored only 505 open-play goals—the fewest since the pandemic-affected 2020-21 season. Moreover, the total of open-play shots on target is the lowest in Opta’s records, revealing a trend towards a less dynamic style of play.

Although intricate passing and attacking movements often characterize successful football, this season has seen a notable decrease in both open-play shots and the completion of open-play passes in the attacking third. The result is a style of play that frequently neglects the thrilling elements that fans adore.

Addressing this concerning trend may require not only alterations in rules and on-field strategies but also the willingness of a coach or club to take innovative risks. Therefore, I suggest that a team should consider employing a back three formation—a tactic that appears overlooked in recent times.

– Top 50 USMNT players of 2026, ranked by club form
– Do Premier League summer transfers need more patience?
– Premier League Power Rankings: Chelsea up, Liverpool down

Why No One Is Playing with a Back Three

Hold on—where are you going?

“Are you seriously suggesting that more teams should adopt the back three formation that Ruben Amorim used before he got sacked? Have you seen Manchester United’s performance since they abandoned that approach?”

First, let’s clarify that when Amorim was let go, his team was sixth in the standings. Additionally, I’d argue that Manchester United was among the few teams embracing an adventurous style of play, resulting in matches filled with excitement.

“Wasn’t part of the issue that he clung too tightly to the back three?”

This brings us to the problem of a back three’s reputation, which has been marred by misconceptions. In a paper published in 2022, soccer analysts Pascal Bauer, Gabriel Anzer, and Laurie Shaw explored team formations and their contextual effectiveness. Their work highlighted how formations are dynamically fluid, and team success depends on how well players adapt in various situations.

Examining how teams build play provides insight into the effectiveness of various formations. Their research indicated that while the back three has its advantages, it tends to be more vulnerable compared to the back four during build-up phases.

That said, a back three has undeniably shown success for clubs that have adapted this strategy, particularly in situations where overcoming the odds was crucial. For example, Inter Milan reached two Champions League finals despite being less financially privileged than their rivals.

The Benefits of Embracing a Back Three

In the past decade, teams that have overachieved often employed the back three formation. Chelsea, under Thomas Tuchel and even how Sheffield United surprised the league, exemplify the advantages of this approach.

Moreover, powerhouses like Manchester City have also adapted to similar structures within their gameplay, particularly as they progressed to recent triumphs.

In today’s Premier League landscape, where set pieces dominate games, exploring a back three formation could provide teams with new strategic dimensions while reducing the pressure of filling complex positions. Flexibility in tactical structures would allow clubs to adapt their strategies dynamically, capitalizing on various formations according to their specific opponents.

While the best teams have gravitated towards a back four, adopting a back three could disrupt the established patterns of play that many teams have become accustomed to defending against. By taking this risk, clubs would not only gain a competitive edge on the field but also reshape their recruitment strategies in a way that lessens the need for highly coveted player types.

Ultimately, soccer thrives on creativity and finding new pathways to victory. In the current climate, a back three could represent an untapped avenue for breaking free from the repetitive nature of modern Premier League football.

So, I urge someone to take the plunge: Try achieving success with a back three!