FIFA Lifts Ban on Water…

FIFA Lifts Ban on Water…

FIFA has reversed its earlier decision to prohibit World Cup fans from bringing refillable water bottles into the tournament’s 16 venues across North America, following significant backlash from fan groups and prominent politicians.

On Friday, FIFA shared an updated policy via social media, stating, “all fans will be allowed to bring in one factory-sealed, 20-ounce (590ml) plastic disposable water bottle into any FIFA World Cup 2026 match in the USA and Canada.”

Predicting outcomes for all 48 World Cup teams
Essential info about all 48 World Cup teams
FIFA revokes World Cup tickets mistakenly issued for free

However, the organization clarified that “hard-sided, reusable bottles” will still be prohibited for reasons of safety and security.

Originally, FIFA’s stadium guidelines had indicated that fans could bring in a transparent, reusable bottle with a maximum capacity of 1 liter (33.8 ounces). However, an updated policy released Tuesday specified that “to eliminate confusion, reusable water bottles may not enter the stadium.”

In a statement released Thursday, FIFA explained that the initial ban on bottles—which could potentially be thrown—was implemented to mitigate risks and protect the safety of players and attendees.

“FIFA prioritizes the health and safety of all players, referees, fans, volunteers, and staff,” the organization stated.

With expected temperatures exceeding 90 degrees in many of the U.S., Canadian, and Mexican cities hosting the tournament’s 104 matches, FIFA’s initial policy change faced widespread criticism.

The Free Lions, an English fan group, remarked that the ban seemed like “just the latest money grab.”

World Cup stadiums will exclusively sell water, sodas, and juices supplied by Coca-Cola, a long-time FIFA sponsor, starting Thursday.

New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani expressed concerns to The Athletic, stating that the ban was troubling, as spectators would also be exposed to extreme heat for extended periods.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the decision as “wrong” and suggested it was driven by profit motives.
Information from The Associated Press was included in this report.