The video assistant referee (VAR) continues to stir debate weekly across leagues such as the Premier League, Champions League, and FA Cup. But how are decisions regarding these controversies made, and are they justified?
This season, we will analyze key incidents to clarify the procedures involved, considering both VAR protocols and the laws governing the game.
Andy Davies (@andydaviesref), a former Select Group referee with over 12 seasons on the elite list, has vast experience officiating in the Premier League and Championship. Having worked with VAR in the Premier League, he provides valuable insights into the processes, reasoning, and protocols that occur on match days.
Referee: Chris Kavanagh
VAR: Darren England
Time: 90+5 minutes
Incident: Disallowed West Ham goal due to a foul
The thrilling second half between West Ham and Arsenal ends with a VAR decision that will be discussed for weeks, months, and even years to come. 🗣️ pic.twitter.com/5JYJMmqGwd
— NBC Sports Soccer (@NBCSportsSoccer) May 10, 2026
Incident Overview: In the dying seconds of the match, West Ham thought they had equalized with a goal from Callum Wilson after a chaotic corner. The goal came about after Arsenal goalkeeper David Raya mishandled the initial cross while being pressured by West Ham players, claiming he was fouled by West Ham’s Pablo.
Initially, referee Chris Kavanagh allowed the goal. However, VAR intervened, believing Pablo had indeed fouled Raya, prompting a review of the on-field decision.
VAR Review: VAR Darren England meticulously reviewed the footage, understanding the importance of a thorough examination in such a critical moment of the match.
The review was complex due to the presence of multiple players in contention, requiring an assessment of various potential fouls. Key factors included the nature of the physical contact and its impact on Raya’s ability to play the ball.
England determined that Pablo’s arm positioned across Raya’s chest interfered with the goalkeeper’s movement and ability to catch the ball. Thus, he concluded that a foul had occurred that directly influenced the outcome of the potential goal.
Consequently, England advised for Kavanagh to check the monitor, at which point the referee concurred and annulled the goal.
Conclusion: Correct Decision
This situation exemplified the effective use of VAR during a crucial moment of the match that could significantly affect the season.
Despite the complexity of the review, the VAR’s skill in identifying impactful contact proved invaluable. The thorough examination ensured no critical details were overlooked, especially given the high stakes.
The obstruction caused by Pablo’s arm on Raya’s chest indisputably hindered the goalkeeper, making the original goal unacceptable.
VAR was designed to assist referees when they miss occurrences during play that are unseen or difficult to detect. As this was a challenging situation for Kavanagh to identify without technological support, the review demonstrated the positive role technology can play during pivotal moments in the season.