That situation has sparked a new dilemma.
Rashford’s contract with Manchester United runs until 2028. On £325,000 per week, he is the club’s highest earner, even as minority owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe tries to keep wage spending—by far United’s biggest cost—under control.
United’s transfer business has slowed since Belgium midfielder Youri Tielemans arrived for £35m on 14 July.
Uncertainty around Rashford isn’t the only factor, but United’s pursuit of a left-sided attacker or another striker will inevitably be shaped by whether he stays, given he can play both roles.
Similarly, their wage budget looks different depending on whether Rashford’s salary remains on the books.
Fans are divided.
Many believe his training-ground clash with Amorim reflected a player who no longer felt the joy of representing his boyhood club.
Comparisons have been drawn between his form before leaving United and his performances at Aston Villa, with England, and then Barcelona.
Others argue he’s far too good to let go—a local talent who could flourish with a supportive approach and make a major impact in Carrick’s side.
A related question: could United find a player of similar stature for £26m, the fee sources close to Rashford say wouldn’t be exceeded because it had been agreed with Barcelona?