Tonda Eckert acknowledged his role in the spying scandal that led to Southampton being disqualified from the play-offs.
The independent disciplinary committee that decided to expel Southampton from the play-offs and impose a four-point penalty for the upcoming season stated that senior officials had supported the spying initiative, describing it as a “contrived and determined plan from the top down.”
Advertisement
The commission accused Southampton of acting disgracefully by pressuring William Salt, the intern who filmed a Middlesbrough training session, to fulfill their demands, exploiting his job insecurity.
The commission released their written justification for the punishment, stating that Southampton had “seriously violated” the integrity of the play-offs, necessitating a significant sporting penalty.
Southampton admitted to several breaches of EFL rules, having also engaged in spying on Oxford United and Ipswich Town prior to matches against them. The commission noted that Salt refused to spy on Ipswich.
Eckert confessed during the hearing that he aimed to uncover the tactical approach of Oxford in their first match under caretaker manager Craig Short, following the dismissal of Gary Rowett. He also wanted to know if Middlesbrough midfielder Hayden Hackney would be available for the semi-final’s first leg at the Riverside.
Advertisement
The committee concluded that Eckert intended to shape his game strategy based on information acquired through illegal means.
Saints Intern William Salt was authorized to spy on other clubs by Tonda Eckert (Social media)
The commission stated: “The observations were approved at a senior level and delegated to the intern in reference to the MFC and OU incidents. He declined to participate in the IT incident. The findings from these observations were used in analyses conducted by the team and were discussed with Mr. Eckert and others to inform match strategies.
“Mr. Eckert admitted he had specifically sanctioned the observations to gather details about formations (in the OU incident) and the availability of a key player (in the MFC incident). This information was sought intentionally to factor into strategy, indicating an inherent sporting advantage derived from private information possessed by your opponent.
Advertisement
“Junior staff members felt pressured to undertake tasks that they believed were morally wrong, as they were in vulnerable positions without job security.”
Southampton were expelled from the play-offs for spying on their opponents (PA)
Southampton maintained that they were unaware of the rules regarding the observation of other clubs’ training sessions, which were instituted after Leeds spied on Derby in 2019. They claimed they needed to adhere to EFL regulations.
The FA is currently investigating Southampton, which may result in charges against Eckert.
However, the independent disciplinary committee asserted that a mere financial penalty would not suffice as punishment due to the significance of promotion.
Advertisement
The committee concluded: “Public confidence was crucial. We have determined that there was a deliberate and concerted effort from the top down to secure a competitive edge, involving much more than a benign act and an especially reprehensible approach in utilizing junior staff to engage in covert operations directed by senior personnel. The integrity of the play-off competition was severely compromised.”